Performance comparison between composite plasticizers and traditional plasticizers

With the widespread application of plastic products in modern industry, the selection of plasticizers, as key materials to improve the flexibility and durability of plastics, has become crucial. This article will compare the performance of composite plasticizers and traditional plasticizers from multiple perspectives and analyze their advantages in different application scenarios.

1. Comparison of anti-aging performance

Experimental data show that composite plasticizers are superior in anti-aging performance because they contain multiple ingredients and can better resist the erosion of the external environment. Typical aging test results are as follows:

• Composite plasticizer: The anti-aging test pass rate is as high as 95%, effectively reducing the aging and deformation of plastic products.
• Traditional plasticizers: The anti-aging test pass rate is 75%, and they are easily decomposed under high temperature or ultraviolet rays.

2. Comparison of flexibility

Flexibility is one of the important indicators for evaluating the performance of plasticizers. After multiple bending tests, the composite plasticizer has better flexibility and can adapt to various complex processing requirements.

• Composite plasticizer: It is not easy to break under bending test and has good ductility.
• Traditional plasticizers: Cracks are more likely to occur after increasing the number of bending times and the flexibility is poor.

3. Comparison of environmental performance

Environmental performance has become an important consideration for modern industry in selecting plasticizers. Composite plasticizers significantly improve the environmental performance of plastic products by reducing the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

• Composite plasticizer: Low VOC emission, in line with international environmental standards.
• Traditional plasticizers: They release high amounts of VOCs and are potentially harmful to the environment and human health.

4. Safety performance comparison

Safety is one of the key factors in measuring the quality of plasticizers. Through a series of toxicology and biocompatibility tests, composite plasticizers perform better in terms of safety performance.

• Composite plasticizer: low toxicity, safer to use.
• Traditional plasticizers: pose high health risks and are limited in use.

in conclusion

Through comparative analysis, it can be seen that composite plasticizers are superior to traditional plasticizers in terms of anti-aging, flexibility, environmental protection and safety, and have obvious application advantages. With the improvement of environmental protection and safety requirements, composite plasticizers will be more and more widely used in the modern plastics industry, and deserve the attention and choice of more companies.

The above is a case study comparing the performance of composite plasticizers and traditional plasticizers. I hope it will provide you with valuable reference when choosing plasticizers.