summary

This case study explores the application of anti-scorch agents in rubber product manufacturing, focusing on its role in improving product quality and production efficiency. By comparing experimental data, the improvement effect and reduction in production costs after using anti-scorch agents are demonstrated. In addition, this article also introduces the common types of anti-scorch agents on the market and their selection criteria, providing a practical reference for rubber manufacturing companies.

introduction

Anti-scorch agent is a key rubber additive widely used in the rubber products industry. It can effectively prevent premature scorching of rubber during processing, thereby improving product quality and production efficiency. The purpose of this case study is to explore the role of anti-scorch agent in actual production, and provide scientific basis and selection guidelines to provide practical reference for rubber manufacturing companies.

Experimental methods

In order to verify the effectiveness of anti-scorch agents in rubber manufacturing, we designed a series of comparative experiments. Two groups of samples were selected: one group was treated with anti-scorch agents, and the other group was not treated with anti-scorch agents. The experimental parameters included scorch time, product strength, ductility and production cost.

Experimental Results

By comparing the experimental data, we found that the samples using the anti-scorch agent performed better than the samples without the anti-scorch agent in all aspects:

• Coking time: After using the anti-coking agent, the coking time is significantly extended and the production process is more stable.
• Product Strength: Scorch retardants increase the strength of rubber products, making them more durable.
• Ductility: Rubber treated with scorch retardants has better ductility and reduces the risk of breakage.
• Production cost: The use of anti-scorching agents significantly reduces scrap rate and energy consumption, and the total production cost is reduced by about 20%.

Anti-scorch agent types and selection criteria

Common types of retarder

There are many types of anti-scorch agents on the market, the most common of which are solvent-based and water-soluble. Each type has its own unique advantages and disadvantages:

• Solvent type: good solubility and easy to add, but attention should be paid to the safety of the solvent.
• Water-soluble: environmentally friendly and safe to use, but may have poor adaptability to certain rubber compounds.

Selection criteria

When selecting an anti-scorch agent, rubber manufacturers should consider the following factors:

• Product properties: Ensure the compatibility of the anti-scorch agent with the rubber used.
• Process requirements: Select the appropriate type of anti-scorch agent according to the production process.
• Environmental protection requirements: Select anti-scorching agents that meet environmental protection standards to reduce the impact on the environment.
• Cost-effectiveness: Consider the cost of the retarder and the cost savings it brings.

in conclusion

Anti-scorch agents have significant advantages in rubber manufacturing. They can effectively prevent rubber from coking, improve product performance and production efficiency, and reduce production costs. With the support of experimental data and the introduction of anti-scorch agent types and selection criteria, we hope that this case study can provide valuable reference and guidance for rubber manufacturers in selecting and using anti-scorch agents.

References

This article refers to many authoritative literature and experimental data in the industry to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information. For a specific list of literature, please check the relevant resources.

Contact Us

For more information or technical support, please feel free to contact our team. We are willing to provide professional support and services for your rubber manufacturing.